87% think Bush should be impeached

[JsLilSis]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904

interesting, but not surprising.

[MHSGuard]

That may be true according to the polls but personally i think Bush is doing his best but i am kinda torn because i am very against war and i personally think that the war should be over but on the other hand i sincerally think that we did the right thing in going into the war so i do not think that his actions necerally call for impeachment but i do think we need to get our soldiers back home because right now i do not think that there is any reason for them to be over there losing there lives we did what we went over there for


<3Fauna<3

[CelestialAngel]

That may be true according to the polls but personally i think Bush is doing his best but i am kinda torn because i am very against war and i personally think that the war should be over but on the other hand i sincerally think that we did the right thing in going into the war so i do not think that his actions necerally call for impeachment but i do think we need to get our soldiers back home because right now i do not think that there is any reason for them to be over there losing there lives we did what we went over there for


<3Fauna<3


I am just curious, why do you think war was the right thing to do? What, in your opinion, did we go "over there" for?

[SkyCaptain]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904

interesting, but not surprising.
This is an MSNBC poll. We realy must keep in mind that this is liberal media and the poll reflects what the liberals believe and not what the rest of America believes. If we were to poll the whole of America, you could find that the percentage would drop conciderably and would probably not be news worthy. Sorry, but this is not a credible poll.

[2nddan]

This is an MSNBC poll. We realy must keep in mind that this is liberal media and the poll reflects what the liberals believe and not what the rest of America believes. If we were to poll the whole of America, you could find that the percentage would drop conciderably and would probably not be news worthy. Sorry, but this is not a credible poll.

According to the latest election, the liberals were elected. That would be the rest of America. If it is not a credible poll, find a poll that refutes the claim. If you don't like the poll, fine, but that doesn't make it any less credible.
ted

[SkyCaptain]

According to the latest election, the liberals were elected. That would be the rest of America. No, that is the half that voted ted not the half that did not.

If it is not a credible poll, find a poll that refutes the claim. If you don't like the poll, fine, but that doesn't make it any less credible.
tedWhether I like it or not is not the point, I detect a little sarcasm in you post. believe me I am not tring to be nasty in here in any way. If I were to give you another poll it would only serve nothing. besides I do not believe polls for on either side they will be biased. Now, instead of a poll how about if that were to be an actual vote, then it would have merit to it, now would it not?

[2nddan]

No, that is the half that voted ted not the half that did not.

If the half that voted were the only ones who got out to vote, then the other half don't have a right to complain. (boy, that was a convoluted sentence! :D )

Still stands, though. The liberals got elected.

Whether I like it or not is not the point, I detect a little sarcasm in you post. believe me I am not tring to be nasty in here in any way. If I were to give you another poll it would only serve nothing. besides I do not believe polls for on either side they will be biased. Now, instead of a poll how about if that were to be an actual vote, then it would have merit to it, now would it not?

No troubles. I would much rather argue civilly.
I didn't mean to come across as sarcastic. But you said the poll wasn't credible. What is your basis for that claim? I inferred that you must not like the poll or the source.
You are correct that whichever side conducts the poll, it will swing their way. But I don't think that takes the credibility away.
By the by, I voted mostly democratic, but I don't think Bush should be impeached. The very thought is wrong. He hasn't done anything illegal. I don't agree with most of his decisions, but that is the beauty of this country!
ted

[Mr.smiley]

The ones who voted for the Liberal Democrats who won, were Liberal Democrats. The others that didn't vote for them were conservetive Republicans. The ones who didn't vote have no say. (so I guess I have no say.) http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/4/4_13_6.gif (http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb001_ZNxmk572YYUS)





http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb113&pp=ZNxmk572YYUS (http://smiley.smileycentral.com/download/index.jhtml?partner=ZSzeb113_ZNxmk572YYUS&utm_id=7921)

[SkyCaptain]

If the half that voted were the only ones who got out to vote, then the other half don't have a right to complain. (boy, that was a convoluted sentence! :D )

Still stands, though. The liberals got elected.Yes,liberals got the election, and I believe it to be because of low voter turn out on the other side as well, but none the less I congratulate them on their victory. And I did vote in this past election by the way.



No troubles. I would much rather argue civilly.
I didn't mean to come across as sarcastic. But you said the poll wasn't credible. What is your basis for that claim? I inferred that you must not like the poll or the source.
You are correct that whichever side conducts the poll, it will swing their way. But I don't think that takes the credibility away.

Well, as Reagan would say, Lets look at this poll from Time. According to this if one was to believe in polls, less Republicans were enthused about voting and most probably did not vote in this past election and swinging the victory to the Democrats.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1555024,00.html

Posted Sunday, Nov. 05, 2006
With just three days left until the midterm elections, a new poll commissioned by TIME shows that Republicans may be approaching voting day without one of the big advantages they enjoyed in November 2004 — their ability to motivate supporters to go out and vote. Among registered Democrats polled, 52% say they're more enthusiastic about voting than usual, compared with just 39% of Republicans. Thirty-seven percent of Republican respondents are less enthusiastic than usual, while only 29% of Democrats feel that way.

Another challenge facing the G.O.P. is a stark drop-off in support among what is usually a core constituency: white evangelical Christians. According to TIME's poll, only 54% of people in this group favor Republican candidates, with 5% undecided. Thirty-eight percent of white evangelicals polled say they'll support Democrats. In 2004, exit polls indicated that 78% of this constituency voted for Bush. While the G.O.P. won out in the poll by seven points (42-35) as the party perceived as best equipped to protect moral values, a matter especially important to this group, the party's standing among evangelicals may have been hurt by recent Congressional scandals, which have tarnished the G.O.P. especially. Forty-one percent of registered voters said Congressional scandals were extremely or very important as voting issues this campaign.

A third factor running against the G.O.P. is an improvement in men's attitudes towards the Democrats. Males provided much of the Bush victory margin in 2004: the President took 55% of the male vote while John Kerry won 44%, according to exit polls. For the 2006 midterms, the TIME poll suggests men are almost evenly split, with 43% supporting Republican candidates and 47% Democrats. Women in the TIME poll support Democratic candidates by a lopsided 59% to 33% for Republicans. In 2004, Kerry had just a three-point edge among females.


By the by, I voted mostly democratic, but I don't think Bush should be impeached. The very thought is wrong. He hasn't done anything illegal. I don't agree with most of his decisions, but that is the beauty of this country!
ted
I believe as you do, word for word. I also think most people believe the way you and I do and that should give more credence to my point I would think.

[Tarja]

If it can be found, by law, that President Bush has acted wrongly, he should indeed be impeached. However, this should not happen because people disagree with his decisions.

[chris1990]

Impeached, no
but I'm serious against his politic

My arguments:

-War in Iraq, Saddam used in (I believe) 1994 chemical wapons, little bit late to begin a war +/- 10 years lather

-Guantánamo Bay

[melody48]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904

interesting, but not surprising.
i just went to vote i want bush
impeached i dislike him big time:D

[charminglin]

Impeached, no
but I'm serious against his politic

My arguments:

-War in Iraq, Saddam used in (I believe) 1994 chemical wapons, little bit late to begin a war +/- 10 years lather

-Guantánamo Bay

I agree.
And what does it help to start a war about it 10 years later?
He attacked the country, and not just saddam. And were all of the people in Iraq responsible for what Saddam did 10 years ago? No ofcousre not, so why punish them too?

[chris1990]

Hope that he will be gone soon! Is it true that his brother want to be president? Hope not!

[charminglin]

Oww.. I definitly hope not!
He'll probably do the same as Bush, and we don't want that for another 4 years!

[melody48]

Oww.. I definitly hope not!
He'll probably do the same as Bush, and we don't want that for another 4 years!
oh god i would cry if that happends onother 4 years with a bush oh im sick:eek:

[chris1990]

oh god i would cry if that happends onother 4 years with a bush oh im sick:eek:

I agree Melody, have you heard of it in the USA?

[melody48]

I agree Melody, have you heard of it in the USA?
no i heard the rumor god i hope it does not come true:eek:

[charminglin]

Let's all hope not.
Like Melody said, another 4 years with a bush!! not cool!!

[chris1990]

Thanx for the info! It's just that I've heard it many times in Europe, was wondering of you knew it!

[Scollzie]

When Bush decided to go into Iraq, he should've been kitted with webbing, M-16, couple of mags, ratpacks, ill-fitting boots (standard size in army is ill-fitting), and dropped in the location of his choice, Southern Iraq somewhere, I suppose.
Then the pilot coulda returned home & the US Army coulda rooted for Bush as they watched him on CNN. Iraqi army woulda then done well to go fetch ol' Saddam, kit him out similarly & given him his marching orders in the general direction of where Bush was dropped.
We coulda all had days of laughter watching these two lost farts hunting eachother out in the desert, but no - they had to go and spoil it with a real war, where thousands of lives are lost every month, not that the Iraqi army actually fought back at all anyway, but here I mean the aftermath, which was just so painfully predictable anyway! tch tch tch. :rolleyes:
My dog even shook its head when it saw the begin of the US invasion on CNN (Canine News Network? :D )

[Trader47]

Yeah, kind of like Capt. Kirk and that big lizard like thing....and then Picard did it with something else later on. I like the idea, as long as the victor doesn't get any spoils. They'd simply have to make do with the knowledge that they've finally found a way to become useful by providing days of entertainment for millions as their reward. And coming to think of it, of course it's too late for Sadaam to participate, and unfortunately way too late to do anything about the countless thousands of lives that have been utterly destroyed...but Bush could still be a participant, and I'm sure some other lost fart could be found to act as proxy for Sadaam. Our planet may be rapidly running out of most resources, but for as long as it'll support life, one thing I seriously doubt that we'll ever have to worry about running out of is lost farts. :D

[Scollzie]

I hear you, Trader! :cool:

It's probably one of the most robust subspecies, the lost farts. The world's probably had them all over at some time or other, I mean take Mugabe, Idi Amin, etc, feel free to add thousands to this list if you wish...
You know what? They could actually replace wars the world over with an annual "Lost Farts Olympics" where they can all compete against eachother, the gold-medalist would need to relish in some sort of spoils however, and I'm hoping you'd have an apt suggestion for us here, Trader? ;)

[Trader47]

Well, coming to think of it, maybe we could offer the victor a one-way ticket to the asteroid of their choice...and even allow them to take a couple hundred of their closest advisors, family members and...uh...'business' associates along so that they'd have a whole new little world to impose themselves on. The chance to dominate a whole new planet....what self-respecting lost fart could resist an incentive like that? And then, of course, the losers would all be invited back for the next Olympics...:cool: